Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-A (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150309
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 43.5 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 68.9 30% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 145 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19% Very poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 30.6 24% 29.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 0.03 Splatting 0.09 9% 12.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 843GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 107 68 11 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 52 Write 45 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 47.4 35% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 112%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 77 85 97 93 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 61.5 Write 66.8 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 86.3 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	239x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	123x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	111x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	177x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	116x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	109x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	36x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16