Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 14:25
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 426
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.2
83% 103 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 99.7
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
689GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 470 476 486 428 366 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 457
Mixed 408
SusWrite 446
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 63.3
211% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 363
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
36GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 113 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 113
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
952GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 152 152 154 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 132
Mixed 78
SusWrite 151
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
57GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 90 91 91 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 71
SusWrite 90.7
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 109%
Imation ImationFlashDriv 4GB
2GB free, PID 044e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 0.8
4% 3.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback