Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 11:50
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 236
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Dell(1028 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 27.7
24% 29.4 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 28.5
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 257 255 274 265 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 324
Write 287
Mixed 207
SusWrite 268
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 35.6
108% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 93.1
71% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ACF0 500GB
437GB free
Firmware: 2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 120 122 112 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 122
Write 103
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 120
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-UH 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 31.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback