Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 169 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 506 50% 410 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 7.67 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 7.03 6% 7.89 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 8.61 7% 8.79 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCud 250GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 150 92 104 159 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 508 Write 442 Mixed 347 SusWrite 162 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 26.7 97% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 24.3 DQ Mixed 86.4 62% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston 9965432-047.A00LF M391B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-PB Kingston 9965432-047.A00LF M391B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston 9965432-047.A00LF M391B5773DH0-CK0 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 32.2 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	499x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373