| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-C/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170315 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 01 '19 at 00:29 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.6%
Above average
|
64% 93.5 Pts
|
18% 132 Pts
|
9% 140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
|
31.4%
Below average
|
32% 35.7 fps
|
30% 37.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
kingSSD-S100240SSD 240GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 363 56 98 95 94 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
72% 320 MB/s
|
55% 16.3 MB/s
|
16% 39.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
932GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 202 205 203 201 202 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
97% 132 MB/s
|
156% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71%
Very good
|
74% 26 GB/s
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
66% 60.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-C/BR Builds (Compare 233 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-C/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 38x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 29x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $215 |