| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar H61MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110407 |
| Uptime | 8.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '16 at 06:26 |
| Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
59.3%
Above average
|
59% 99.2 Pts
|
28% 210 Pts
|
16% 262 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7306
|
28.8%
Poor
|
28% 36.4 fps
|
31% 38.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
48.4%
Average
|
40% 182 MB/s
|
92% 28.9 MB/s
|
22% 38.4 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
82% 109 MB/s
|
80% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
179GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
27% 23.1 MB/s
|
70% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM2U139C4P2-B01S AM2U139C4P2-B01S 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.5%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MH Builds (Compare 98 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H61MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 19x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 14x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 31x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $87 |