Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '19 at 22:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 292
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 22 22 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 49
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 23.4
46% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 5.9
1,001% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
299GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 21 22 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 22.4
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 5.8
1,019% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 96%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
296GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 20 22 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 52.7
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 21.9
47% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 5.8
1,001% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 47.6
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 17.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 110%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback