Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 LE (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '16 at 11:49
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	MLT-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 95.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 194 77% 130 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 490 50% 405 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 152 Parallax 142 114% 145 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 135 Splatting 110 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 791GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 296 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 143 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 63 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 640969561	77.2% Very good	Read 269 Write 213 Mixed 219 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 42 146% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 105 100% 158 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 133%
Transcend TS480GJDM500 480GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 321GB free Firmware: 2014 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 574 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 878 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 91 (A3) Unknown 100 100 14 (A4) Unknown 100 100 739 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8159 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8159 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6783	97.1% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 433 Mixed 463 105% 470 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 35.4 124% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 76.8 109% 203 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 97%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 229GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 961 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 522 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2074574652
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1271 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 964 (B1) Unknown 99 99 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 61 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8729817870	95.9% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 405 Mixed 447 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 25.5 126% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 71.4 114% 219 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 513GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 160198397 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2585 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 4371003520 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4492 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2424 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 472 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 504889374 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 60129542174 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 25 160198397 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 128621385624329 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3568748364 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3968895767	57% Above average	Read 104 Write 94.5 Mixed 99 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 68%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB 1,031 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 595GB free, PID 01de Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 83.9 Write 81.2 Mixed 74.5 102% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 4x8GB 587 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72% Very good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 23.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 20.7 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	309x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	230x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	72x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16