Lenovo 20FB002LLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 28% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FB002LLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FB002LLM
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160901
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 06:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 37%
CPU Throttled 28%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 210
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 5.87
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 11.8
7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 373 375 353 330 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 377
Mixed 335
SusWrite 349
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 39.7
119% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 333
252% 340 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLTMLAR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Chip LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback