Lenovo 20FBS0Q000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FBS0Q000  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FBS0Q000
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 29 '16 at 18:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 162
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 219
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4505
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 6.41
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,339
356% 1,605 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 53.9
209% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 209
218% 362 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 253%
Great: 262%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
743GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 92.6
Write 98.5
Mixed 92.7
123% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
659GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 101
Write 97.2
Mixed 90.3
123% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLTMLAR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Chip LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback