Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4518AA3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4518AA3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 08:13
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 446
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Legend(17AA 3070) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 302 302 302 302 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 431
Mixed 387
SusWrite 309
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 38.9
129% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
599GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 129
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
720GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 98.6
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback