Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 913 81% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,874 116% 1,874 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 44.5 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 61.7 48% 59 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,736 Write 2,189 Mixed 1,480 473% 2,135 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 81.9 285% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 902 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 832 626% 838 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 594 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 408GB free Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 1431 1407 1382 1426 1418 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,475 Write 1,315 Mixed 969 SusWrite 1,403 290% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 58.7 193% 69.7 MB/s	DQ Read 905 DQ Write 776 DQ Mixed 616 523% 766 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 259%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 155GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 72 75 76 78 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 522 Write 350 Mixed 268 SusWrite 94.3 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 27.1 101% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 444 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 134 134% 227 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 32GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 186 186 147 181 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 126 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 181 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 24GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 209 211 202 216 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 106GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 141 160 166 122 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 156 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 140 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 114%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 55GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 66 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 93.5 Write 92 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 67.8 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 460GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 130 128 126 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 146 Write 136 Mixed 74 SusWrite 131 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	MC Read 71 MC Write 68.2 MC Mixed 59.2 189% 66.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 44.9 SC Mixed 30.4 92% 32.1 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $913

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16