Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$579
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
96% 205 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,054
99% 801 Pts
64-Core 2,050
138% 2,050 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2913 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
47.4% Average
Lighting 164
Reflection 163
Parallax 163
43% 163 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 162
Splatting 164
48% 163 fps
Poor: 119%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$160
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1536 1589 1735 1797 1801 1779 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 1,684
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 1706
360% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.4
168% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1242
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,158
871% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 284%
Great: 397%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
351GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 340 356 366 367 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 384
Write 349
Mixed 326
SusWrite 355
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 29
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 135%
AMD VDRIVE02 223GB
146GB free
Firmware: 000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1107 680 570 567 565 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 84% Great: 122%
AMD T00 StoreMI 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 367 356 353 352 355 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB
11GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 5 5.1 4.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.1
9% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.3
119% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$42
20GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 294 308 314 316 310 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 122%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 47.7
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 38.6
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 35
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 2,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,790
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback