Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '19 at 19:14
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 443 59% 444 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	27.6% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 41.9 26% 36.3 fps	MRender 44 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 29.3 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GB 337 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 101 109 110 109 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 473 Write 280 Mixed 332 SusWrite 128 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 35.6 135% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 195 173% 259 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 461GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 92 98 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 95 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 97 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 68%
iT1167 USB Flash Disk 16GB 11GB free, PID 1167 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 9.1 8.6 9.1 8.6 9.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.38% Terrible	Read 26 Write 1 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 7.9 8% 8.85 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.67 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FARG 2x4GB 1,065 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 29.1 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.1 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,920x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,683x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	606x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	721x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	230x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	213x
MX500 500GBCrucial $39Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	492x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $437

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16