Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 101
49% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 199
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 126
Parallax 185
73% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 124
87% 105 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 68 65 64 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 410
Write 82.4
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 67.6
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 16.4
77% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 48.1
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
267GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 71 45 56 49 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 104
Write 123
Mixed 58
SusWrite 54
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 206 206 209 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 123
Write 97
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 202
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
Asmt 2115 32GB
27GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 18
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.7
674% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
290GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 20 25 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 27.4
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 22.4
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 39%
Seagate Portable 320GB
182GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 27.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 16.7
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 5.6
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback