| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120717 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 18 '19 at 22:39 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.4%
Good
|
60% 96.1 Pts
|
30% 234 Pts
|
18% 282 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88
|
19%
Very poor
|
20% 21.1 fps
|
17% 21.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 87 106 106 108 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
50% 69 MB/s
|
144% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
JMicron 500GB
320GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
35% 26 MB/s
|
22% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
34.6%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,346 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 538x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 207x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $324 |