Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory121.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 304
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 1083
93% 797 Pts
64-Core 2,929
181% 2,929 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 868C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 116
Parallax 111
98% 116 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 86.3
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,552
Write 1766
Mixed 1,308
414% 1,875 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 74.8
271% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 88.9
346% 766 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
111GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 486 486 486 489 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 474
Mixed 414
SusWrite 483
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.1
209% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 211
199% 311 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
490GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 486 487 481 488 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 459
Mixed 345
SusWrite 484
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 63.1
199% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 48.6
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 71
62% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
500GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2035 1029 1030 1049 1057 1059 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,937
Write 2,080
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 1,210
386% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 67.9
219% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 240
393% 744 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 264%
Great: 298%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
22GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 16 17 18 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 19.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 17.3
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3400C16-16GVK F4-3400C16-16GVK F4-3400C16-16GVK F4-3400C16-16GVK Kingston KHX3333C16D4/16GX Kingston KHX3333C16D4/16GX Kingston KHX3333C16D4/16GX Kingston KHX3333C16D4/16GX 128GB
3466, 3466, 3466, 3466, 3466, 3466, 3466, 3466 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 71
MC Mixed 46.2
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 8.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,338
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback