Asus P8Z68-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '16 at 14:36
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 463
57% 434 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1111 MHz, MLim: 1626 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 54
Parallax 79
52% 65.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 51.1
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
I-flashdisk K8 64GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 502
Write 141
Mixed 217
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 31.8
143% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 59
83% 156 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
266GB free
Firmware: GU00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 64.5
Mixed 62.8
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
90GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 69.6
Mixed 67.2
52% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.37
92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C11-4GAO 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 04CD F3-2133C11-4GAO 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-M PRO Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback