Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory55GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 55GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory34.7 GB free of 55 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 16:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0
CPU #000, 14 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 89.8
33% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 452
40% 337 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 472
Write 130
Mixed 450
SusWrite 46
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 14.5
48% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 28.5
20% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 95%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
51GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 91 96 97 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 445
Write 210
Mixed 511
SusWrite 93
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 13.9
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 27.7
20% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 55GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 4096, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 29.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.8
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback