Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 4535s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 4535s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 168B
Memory2.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 10:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3305M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 52.9
32% 47.1 Pts
4-Core 52.8
8-Core 54.7
7% 53.8 Pts
64-Core 58.2
4% 58.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
HP(103C 168C) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 61 74 73 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 79
Write 78
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 72.3
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4535s Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4535s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback