Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L755D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L755D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Torpedo
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 03:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3305M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 12
2-Core 21.1
17% 23 Pts
4-Core 18.7
8-Core 23.1
3% 20.9 Pts
64-Core 23.6
2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.9
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 200 195 181 167 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 242
Write 215
Mixed 216
SusWrite 165
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 17
65% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80.6
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 75.5
56% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L755D Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L755D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback