Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1620 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 18:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 436
56% 425 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 18.1
12% 15.7 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 17.9
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OV-Blitz240GBSSD 240GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 127 103 105 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 462
Write 367
Mixed 300
SusWrite 130
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 11.8
85% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 18
50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 36.4
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback