Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire S7-391

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire S7-391  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Storm
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 12:26
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 103
49% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 146
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0747) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.95 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.3
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit CMT-64L3M 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L2C6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 153 138 53 51 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 378
Write 169
Mixed 177
SusWrite 102
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 16.2
57% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 144
110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 71%
Liteonit CMT-64L3M 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: L2C6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 167 173 173 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 306
Write 170
Mixed 166
SusWrite 173
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 18.6
72% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 152
113% 148 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6MFR6A-H9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire S7-391 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire S7-391

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback