Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 11 '17 at 04:56
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 152
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 413
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3355
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit CMT-64L3M 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: L2C6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 491
Write 178
Mixed 259
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 25.4
104% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 41.2
74% 147 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 67.1
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.03
16% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 63%
Fujitsu MHZ2250BH G2 250GB
137GB free
Firmware: 8909 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 49
Mixed 48.3
37% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.25
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback