Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3930 18 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Memory 19.6 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 30 15% 23.4 Pts	4-Core 45.5 8-Core 48.2 6% 46.8 Pts	64-Core 48.4 3% 48.4 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.62 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mss4fii-m mSATA SSD 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0111A SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 40 40 40 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	Read 218 Write 39 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 39.1 19% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 5.9 40% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 53.4 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 31.8 28% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 324 12% 324 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM