Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3930 18 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 49.9 28% 42 Pts	4-Core 55.6 8-Core 70.9 8% 63.2 Pts	64-Core 67.3 4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.02 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mss4fii-m mSATA SSD 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0111A SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 40 40 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.9% Below average	Read 264 Write 37.4 Mixed 64 SusWrite 38.8 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 6.8 56% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 52.2 DQ Write 39.8 DQ Mixed 31.5 28% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM