Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 16:55
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 692
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.22
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 47.7
46% 52.8 fps
MRender 45.5
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.7
40% 48.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 258GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 245 239 254 263 273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 417
Mixed 294
SusWrite 253
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 42.3
150% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 227
198% 296 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 95%
SSD PLUS 480GB
21GB free
Firmware: Z31000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 296
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 46.4
177% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 230
202% 303 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
199GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 551 552 550 608 583 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 637
Write 638
Mixed 592
SusWrite 565
137% 608 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 75.9
252% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 1,089
718% 849 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 171%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
185GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 252 252 256 286 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 488
Mixed 466
SusWrite 267
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 64.5
224% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
78GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 258 261 264 123 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 442
Mixed 370
SusWrite 199
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.1
195% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 263
225% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
269GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 465 449 482 446 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 477
Mixed 442
SusWrite 456
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 60.3
199% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 348
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 148 149 150 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 154
Write 133
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 148
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback