Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '15 at 19:24
Run Duration475 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$65
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 125
44% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 394
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 9.59
6% 9.02 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.36 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_m 500_MTFDDAK120MA 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 475
Write 128
Mixed 201
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 16.9
55% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 39.7
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3400832AS 400GB-$68
111GB free
Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 53.7
Mixed 53.2
43% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.36
77% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 38%
ADATA HD710 1TB
459GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 109
Write 82.9
Mixed 46.4
93% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.23
31% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 45%
Kingston DT 100 G2 8GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 2.47
Mixed 3.7
7% 7.49 MB/s
4K Read 3.89
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.002
15% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 7%
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback