Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320MA-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 05:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 393
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 67
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 58
55% 63.9 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 0.13
32% 44.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 5.1 35 36 6.6 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 446
Write 49.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 26.2
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
215GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 162 152 157 160 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 30
SusWrite 155
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
283GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64% Good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 113
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU48J7240ND BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 27.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback