Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$76
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 218
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 443
54% 415 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 81.7
0% 48.1 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 52.2
47% 58 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 248 18 19 19 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 223
Write 236
Mixed 232
SusWrite 97.8
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 28.5
106% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 71.6
96% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 102%
Asmedia USB 3.0 Device 500GB
392GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 14 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 11.8
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 14.7
12% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLB-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback