bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100715
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '19 at 21:43
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 47.9 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 30.8 30% 42.1 Pts	4-Core 52.5 8-Core 108 9% 80 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2012) 3.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.69 1% 0.74 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/60G 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8341c75 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 156 58 20 23 24 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 232 Write 207 Mixed 195 SusWrite 75.4 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 17.8 60% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.3 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 110 88% 120 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 69%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 635GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 22 18 20 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 21.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 21.1 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 466GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 11 11 8.7 9.5 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 29 Write 12.7 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 9 18% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.2 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16