Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 21:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 115
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 189
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 0491) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 30.7
21% 28.7 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 23
Splatting 31.6
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 433
Write 79.5
Mixed 129
46% 214 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 3.13
68% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 1.26
25% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
871GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 174
Mixed 168
130% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 14
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $627
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback