Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-V (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '16 at 23:50
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 167 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 332 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2004 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Lighting 49.7 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 42.3 40% 42.3 fps	MRender 41.3 Gravity 45.6 Splatting 40.3 34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 60GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3712 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4291 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 120 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11224219144	63.5% Good	Read 498 Write 229 Mixed 357 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 16.8 94% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 74.4 48% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 118%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8941 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 9163 (B1) Unknown 80 80 703 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 217 (F1) Unknown 99 99 35610842293	60.1% Good	Read 497 Write 240 Mixed 313 77% 350 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 11.6 67% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 73.9 DQ Mixed 53.7 61% 108 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 164 6708 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 563 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 234 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 522 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 295 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2482 (C2) HDA temperature 130 110 20 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.7% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 102 Mixed 96.9 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.26 93% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 68GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 173 8200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 407 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 117 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 362 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 203 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1678 (C2) HDA temperature 129 109 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	62.1% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 113 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.15 93% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 83%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 256GB-$126 448 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 31GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 208 Write 135 Mixed 165 207% 169 MB/s	4K Read 5.35 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.03 48% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 99%
Adata S102 USB 3.0 16GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 6GB free, PID 312a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 115 Write 30.2 Mixed 26.6 56% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 52% 4.58 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 27%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$11 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 6GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 97 Write 38.1 Mixed 41.3 64% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.01 26% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	58x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Kingston 9905413-025.A00LF Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 10GBUnknownBench 43%, 16 samples	8x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 50%, 8 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16