Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProLiant MicroServerr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProLiant MicroServerr  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 38.3
29% 39.3 Pts
4-Core 39
8-Core 38.2
5% 38.6 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 1609) 64MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.44
0% 0.45 fps
MRender 0.62
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.21%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 16 23 23 26 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 25
Write 43.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 20.2
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 13%
 Great: 40%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
144GB free
Firmware: 3.ADJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 63.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 68
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 37.5%
 Great: 40%
VB0160EAVEQ 160GB
143GB free
Firmware: HPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 101 100 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 33.8
Mixed 59
SusWrite 100
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 58.1%
 Great: 58%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
148GB free
Firmware: 3.ADJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 66 68 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 66
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 66.6
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 5.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 15.5%
 Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback