Lenovo 20DT0003MC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20DT0003MC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Intel powered classmate PC
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 148
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 503C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 6.59
4% 5.62 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 7.83
5% 5.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umax 2242 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180731
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 428 402 437 440 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 438
Mixed 391
SusWrite 424
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 36.7
137% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 271
201% 263 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419
12GB free
Firmware: 5.0.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 130
Write 212
Mixed 146
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 26.5
104% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 105
104% 166 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback