UMAX J42 Nano

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemUMAX J42 Nano  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 17:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 79.3
36% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 234
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0301 02F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umax 2242 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 376 361 369 364 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 310
Write 346
Mixed 337
SusWrite 361
77% 338 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 26.8
118% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 262
196% 258 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 12.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J42 Nano Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: UMAX J42 Nano

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback