PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T1700 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1700 (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180626 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '20 at 23:26 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 11 15 11 7.6 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
386GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 102 104 104 MB/s
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
88GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 MB/s
|
8.24%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 564x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 340x |
Xeon E3-1241 v3Intel $209Bench 75%, 3,580 samples | 229x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 249x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 168x |
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $178 |