Today's hottest deals

MSI B460M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C83)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C83
MotherboardMSI B460M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C83)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 05:01
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,007
96% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 106
Parallax 101
83% 103 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 103
Splatting 98.5
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,417
Write 1,424
Mixed 1,088
292% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 79.9
282% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 116
224% 452 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
536GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 38.8
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 41.1
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 23.4
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 18
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
88% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 139 139 139 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 136
136% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
3GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 75
Mixed 67.1
105% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.3
169% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 26.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 26.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B460M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C83) Builds (Compare 7,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI B460M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C83)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback