Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 06:40
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,115
103% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,509
93% 1,509 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 525.26
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 80.5
78% 89 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 74.1
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 40 96 39 594 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 156
Mixed 188
SusWrite 172
103% 481 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 44
148% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 116
152% 292 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 295%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
494GB free
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 410 404 413 420 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 494
Write 327
Mixed 391
SusWrite 411
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 25.9
103% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 112
100% 150 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 102%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
208GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 437 430 441 446 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 434
Mixed 431
SusWrite 436
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 46.5
150% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 204
154% 208 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 137%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
848GB free
Firmware: 42BEU1TB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2118 2135 2134 2124 2122 2119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,782
SusWrite 2,126
479% 2,133 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 62.7
202% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 702
557% 782 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 330%
Great: 373%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 34.9
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 32.3
101% 35.4 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback