Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 14:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 343
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 656
8-Core 1,178
110% 917 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Gainward(10B0 F279) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 201
Parallax 193
179% 205 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 146
Splatting 130
126% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 134 78 100 112 176 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 45.5
Mixed 122
SusWrite 107
18% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 47.5
33% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 134%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 454 450 465 462 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 402
Mixed 347
SusWrite 455
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 41.8
147% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 209
182% 266 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
267GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 72 77 81 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 8.5
Write 42.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 77.5
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 27.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback