Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770-UD3  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 13:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 20-$59
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 83.3
46% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3452) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 0.94
2% 2.94 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.91
3% 3.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY EU SSD CS131 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 65 85 82 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
Read 253
Write 230
Mixed 123
SusWrite 89.7
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 31.4
82% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 115
95% 136 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 55%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 300GB
45GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 217
Write 249
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 48.5
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 166%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 700GB
173GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 50 49 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
Read 235
Write 215
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 48.6
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA770-UD3 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback