Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 20:55
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 426
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 38.2
32% 36.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.6
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,839
Write 761
Mixed 654
236% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 70.5
242% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 724
569% 789 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 234%
SQF-S25M8-120G-ING 120GB
43GB free
Firmware: S8FM06B7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 194 195 196 196 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 504
Write 196
Mixed 216
SusWrite 191
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 21.9
102% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 69.8
77% 128 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 640GB
320GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 120 120 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 116
Write 94
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 121
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 120%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 215 212 215 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 52.7
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 211
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
255% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 41%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback