Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 735
78% 620 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI960G17AI178 960GB
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 434 433 440 438 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 394
Mixed 390
SusWrite 439
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 25.5
124% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 36
80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 181 181 183 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 172
Mixed 110
SusWrite 182
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 27
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback