Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S3850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S3850  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3850
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 19:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 23,814,714 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 151
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 303
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.16
3% 3.95 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 60 71 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 77.4
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
913GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 80.8
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 100
114% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 12 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 33
Write 8.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 12.8
22% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
104% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3850 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback