PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180808 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 23:21 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 82% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
64.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3776) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 738 1014 1108 1080 1078 1015 MB/s
|
212%
Outstanding
|
|||
Fusion-io ioCache 600GB
536GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
33GB free
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 401 420 426 408 407 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
86GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,252x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,045x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 868x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 743x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 378x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |