Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 217 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 551 60% 476 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 3776) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Lighting 44.3 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 54.2 36% 46.6 fps	MRender 54.1 Gravity 51 Splatting 38.4 38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 678 988 1047 1041 991 1043 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,805 Write 832 Mixed 499 SusWrite 965 227% 1,025 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 41.3 143% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 675 DQ Write 612 DQ Mixed 603 463% 630 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 306%
Fusion-io ioCache 600GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 536GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 106 106 109 109 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	Read 95 Write 110 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 104 22% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 5.2 63% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 11.3 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 13.7 24% 45 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 34%
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152 1,667 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: 706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 357 377 378 365 375 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 309 Write 353 Mixed 222 SusWrite 349 70% 308 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 35 132% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 126 135% 225 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 19.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 15.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	757x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	383x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	147x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	131x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	180x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	161x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440