Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 18:37
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 312
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8521) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 38
Parallax 34.5
32% 37.1 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 31.5
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 31 9.6 60 107 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 323
Write 124
Mixed 175
SusWrite 71.8
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 15.9
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 31.8
24% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 53%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
272GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 92
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
921GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 183 183 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 164
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 182
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 119
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback