Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '20 at 05:07
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	33%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 17.7 2-Core 46.4 30% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 90.2 8-Core 126 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 25.2 16% 21 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 18.8 18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTTAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 339 271 190 269 343 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 442 Write 360 Mixed 360 SusWrite 299 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 18.6 65% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 160 128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB 2,360 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 854GB free Firmware: KA0OA500 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 98.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 93.2 55% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GB 1,157 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16