Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory116.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:07
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 160
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 615
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 2,056
127% 2,056 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.2% Good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 87.7
Parallax 71.1
70% 81.5 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 83
68% 83.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
530GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1064 981 1018 1034 1018 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 1,973
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 1,054
374% 1,666 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 61.3
204% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 619
456% 601 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 237%
Great: 372%
Adaptec Array 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 715 715 715 716 715 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 36% Great: 59%
Synology iSCSI Storage 9TB
8TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
Read 92.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 82.7
20% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 11
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 64.2
49% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965640-013.C00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback