Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 10:32
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 31.4
23% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 33.3
8-Core 33.7
4% 33.5 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 1885) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 81 94 89 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 255
Write 126
Mixed 148
SusWrite 90.5
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 10.2
33% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.4
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 87.9
65% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 73%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 13 11 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 14
Mixed 6
SusWrite 12.7
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
16% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback